| ||
It's a pity that the script for hardlinking tagged files always mirrors the full paths to the files. | ||
|
Messages in this Thread
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,445) - Laurent Duchastel - Sep 17,2010 at 01:38 [Discuss]
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,426) - Ian Binnie - Sep 17,2010 at 05:35
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,203) - Oliver Pretzel - Sep 17,2010 at 13:12
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,222) - Oliver Pretzel - Sep 17,2010 at 21:47
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,248) - Laurent Duchastel - Sep 17,2010 at 22:47
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,183) - Laurent Duchastel - Sep 17,2010 at 22:32
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,437) - Martijn Coppoolse - Sep 17,2010 at 17:54
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,122) - Laurent Duchastel - Sep 17,2010 at 23:02
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,376) - Ian Binnie - Sep 18,2010 at 05:54
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,312) - Oliver Pretzel - Sep 18,2010 at 15:09
- Hardlinking with relative paths? (1,181) - Oliver Pretzel - Sep 18,2010 at 20:26
- [Discuss] How hard would it be to fully support hardlinks/junction internally ? (1,426) - Ian Binnie - Sep 17,2010 at 05:35