ZTree.com  | ZEN  | About...  

 Index   Back

[Wiki] Poll on features   [Wiki]

By: Laurent Duchastel     Montréal, Québec  
Date: Dec 02,2010 at 16:35
In Response to: [Wiki] Poll on features (Martijn Coppoolse)

> I went there, logged in, then got
> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of
> 37748736 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 1572864 bytes) in
> /hermes/bosweb/web087/b879/ipg.laurentduchastelcom/ztwiki/lib/tikidate-php5.php
> on line 182

Hum. Works fine from here.

> Are there other (more
> cross-browser compatible) skins that could be applied?

Not in the basic package. All themes have some glitches.

> As I said, I personally much prefer the tracker to the single page — I
> think having to edit that page has deterred more than one user.

I'll work on a solution on Joomla.

> Rollback is always useful, so I'd choose Tiki.

I found a solution with Joomla after hours of search in the huge extension open directory. This isn't a issue anymore.

> I don't know that wiki article editing has to be harder; I see that
> TikiWiki supports rich editing; is there a specific reason we're not
> using that?
TikiWiki allows a mix of both HTML and wiki syntax, but results are sometime unexpected. This is why Wiki syntax is prefered.

> I think trackers *should* be more useful than a single-page wishlist,
> especially when it's getting very big; that would make administration of
> requests (adding, editing, sorting and searching — and following!) a lot
> easier to do. But it stands or falls with the implementation and ease of
> use, and I seem to remember that Tiki’s was not very straightforward; but
> maybe that too has been revised in the new version.

Trackers handling have been improved in TikiWiki, but are still not very attractive.

> Looking at these points, I still think Tiki would be a better choice.
> On the other hand, if Joomla really is much faster than TikiWiki — and
> can provide comparable functionality — then that might be the better
> option.

TikiWiki has a lot to offer, but the admin has proved to be very difficult.
Joomla is faster and easier, but has to be extensively configured with extensions first. Once done however, it's fast.

> Which of the two is easier to administrate?
Joomla, by far.


Laurent Duchastel

782 views      
Thread locked
 

Messages in this Thread

 
96,637 Postings in 12,231 Threads, 350 registered users, 85 users online (0 registered, 85 guests)
Index | Admin contact |   Forum Time: Mar 28, 2024 - 9:04 pm UTC  |  Hits:62,380,385  (32,782 Today )
RSS Feed