[Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx... by Steve Rawling

[Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx [Comment]

By: Steve Rawling Sydney
Date: Jul 11,2015 at 23:55
In Response to: [Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx (Kim Henkel)

>
> Because the next public release will be v2.5

Thanks Kim for your prompt reply to my somewhat pedantic question. Thanks for your time.

I'm still unaware though why you went from 2.2 to 2.4.1. Perhaps a public release number which is less rounded ( ie 2.5 3 3.5) is undesirable marketing...

I wonder will ztw go from 2.5 to 2.7.1.

1,030 views

Thread locked

Messages in this Thread

[Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx (1,083) - Steve Rawling - Jul 10,2015 at 13:34 [Comment]
- [Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx (1,134) - Kim Henkel - Jul 10,2015 at 14:39
  - [Comment] Why no betas and zeta numbered no v2.3.xxx (1,030) - Steve Rawling - Jul 11,2015 at 23:55