if 32 bit was super faster than 16 bit, why couldnt 64 bit be?... by Ryan

if 32 bit was super faster than 16 bit, why couldnt 64 bit be? [Q]

By: Ryan
Date: Oct 15,2016 at 12:11
In Response to: ztw.exe vs ztw64.exe (Ben Kent)

AA= xt 8 bit + math co-processor

BB= simple AT 16 bit 286 (without a co-processor, i dont know if you can put a co-processor with the 286 computer)

CC= 386 32 bit 33Mhz + co processor

-------------------------------------

AA= was quite as fast as BB= or maybe faster in mathematics.

but CC= was maybe 40 times faster than xt or AT (i forgot exactly, maybe 80 times)

people said 32 bit channels 2 times faster than 16 bit, so the data passing road got wider.

so then why couldnt 64 bit be much much faster and more than 32 bit?

i presume the 64 bit to copy 4 times( by 2-dimensional reading) faster than the 32 bit one.

1,089 views

Thread locked

Messages in this Thread

[Q] does ztw64.exe copy faster than ztw.exe? because it is 64 (1,257) - Ryan - Oct 05,2016 at 05:38 [Q]
- difference between XP & Win10? IF NOT "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%"=="C:\ProgramData" way (1,829) - Ryan - Oct 05,2016 at 08:46
  - difference between XP & Win10? IF NOT "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%"=="C:\ProgramData" way (1,232) - Hartmut Schneider - Oct 06,2016 at 06:10
    - echo %PUBLIC% | find "\Users\" >NUL doesnt work for XP (1,006) - Ryan - Oct 06,2016 at 14:04
      - if errorlevel: order is relevant (1,020) - Hartmut Schneider - Oct 06,2016 at 15:55
        If Defined PUBLIC goto Win10 will do well, thanks (1,093) - Ryan - Oct 15,2016 at 10:56
      - 'set PUBLIC' vs 'echo %PUBLIC%' (1,001) - Hartmut Schneider - Oct 06,2016 at 15:59
    - a word to the find construct (1,051) - Hartmut Schneider - Oct 06,2016 at 17:53
  - distinguish between XP & Win10 (1,009) - Hartmut Schneider - Oct 06,2016 at 17:33
  - difference between XP & Win10? IF NOT "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%"=="C:\ProgramData" way (1,189) - Ben Kent - Oct 06,2016 at 20:09
    - difference .. START "" %C1% %1 and START %C1% %1 (1,003) - Ryan - Oct 15,2016 at 11:40
      - difference .. START "" %C1% %1 and START %C1% %1 (1,036) - Ben Kent - Oct 15,2016 at 20:34
- [Q] does ztw64.exe copy faster than ztw.exe? because it is 64 (1,186) - Peter Shute - Oct 05,2016 at 21:57
- ztw.exe vs ztw64.exe (1,180) - Peter Shute - Oct 06,2016 at 21:03
  - ztw.exe vs ztw64.exe (1,220) - Martijn Coppoolse - Oct 07,2016 at 07:57
  - ztw.exe vs ztw64.exe (1,417) - John Leslie - Oct 07,2016 at 11:18
  - ztw.exe vs ztw64.exe (1,327) - Ben Kent - Oct 07,2016 at 22:00
    - if 32 bit was super faster than 16 bit, why couldnt 64 bit be? (1,089) - Ryan - Oct 15,2016 at 12:11
      - if 32 bit was super faster than 16 bit, why couldnt 64 bit be? (1,051) - Ben Kent - Oct 15,2016 at 21:05